Hey, ISO, April Fools was *yesterday*

Words fail me when ISO approves OOXML

Hereafter, I shall refuse to refer to you as a standards body. Accepting an ill-thought-out set of documentation for Microsoft quirky and proprietary technology in a process that has been widely regarded as suspicious with allegations of corruption, co-opting and buying of votes is a cruel and horrible joke. Thank you so much for nothing.

Here’s an interesting factoid for you (via):

Norway ended up “supporting” OOXML, while 80% of the members of The SN/K 185 subcomittee of Standards Norway were opposed to the proposal.

There has been allegations of “comittee-stuffing” to get a particular view through, so it’s rather interesting to see what the original members of the comittee has to say on the matter (those who were members of SN/K 185 prior to the OOXML process started). For reference, these members were:

  • Lars Marius Garshol
  • Erlend Øverby
  • Thomas Flemming
  • Keld Simonsen
  • Steve Pepper (chairman of SN/K 185)

And, they have all signed an open letter to Standards Norway (the letter is in Norwegian — I’ll try to find an English translation) , opposing OOXML as an ISO standard.

Again, ISO, thanks for exactly nothing.

Comments

Comment from Martin Bekkelund on 2008-04-03 13:17

This is truly a sad chapter in the history of standardization. My trust as a member of SN K/185 with both ISO and Standards Norway is completely gone. Steve Pepper has resigned from his position in SN K/185. This is extremely sad. I can’t find the words.

Thanks for writing on this topic, Arve!

Comment from Chloe on 2008-04-05 19:35

Its like web politics !
I’ve read alot about this latly but haven’t actually studied OOXML so can’t comment on it apart from what i’ve read.
80% against it though and yet supporting it, surely somthing must be done about this.

Make sure you have read the Comment Posting Policy and Privacy Policy before posting.




Remember user info: /

(HTML and Textile formatting possible)